Danai Udomchoke vs Ti Chen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W L L
Form
W L W W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Udomchoke 6 - 1 Chen
They have played 18 sets in total, with Udomchoke winning 13 and Chen winning 5. The last match between Udomchoke and Chen was at the Shanghai Challenger, 03-09-2013, First, Hard with Ti Chen getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Danai Udomchoke | 6 |
| Ti Chen | 1 |
Shanghai Challenger(03-09-2013)
4
6
6
3
6
4
| Udomchoke | Stats | Chen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 6 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 77 | Highest Rank | 184 |
| 43 | Age | 41 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 20 | Titles | 24 |
| 58% (490-352) | Career Total W/L | 60% (683-461) |
| $238,385 | Career Prize Money | $57,495 |
| 6 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Navarro PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Ti Chen
Player
Danai Udomchoke
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Danai Udomchoke
Player
Ti Chen
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
114)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 6-0 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| 5-7 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 13 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 96 | Games Won | 64 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:33:12 | Average Match Time | 0:33:12 |
| 68% (114/168) | 1st Serve % | 69% (136/197) |
| 74% (84/114) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (88/136) |
| 44% (24/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 27% (6/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (5/15) |
| 38% (74/197) | Return Points Win % | 36% (60/168) |
| 86% (6/7) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 14% (1/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Danai Udomchoke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Danai Udomchoke
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
14
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Danai Udomchoke
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danai Udomchoke
Player
Lukasz Kubot
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
49
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Danai Udomchoke
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-7(2) 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Ti Chen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ti Chen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rishi Reddy
Player
Ti Chen
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Geun Jun Kim
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 7-5 10-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tsung-Hua Yang
Player
Ti Chen
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ti Chen
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Han-Chih Lin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (490/352) | Win/Loss | 60% (683/461) |
| 57% (1138/863) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (1507/1130) |
| 53% (9829/8741) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (13137/11473) |
| 63% (397/236) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (621/380) |
| 21% (6/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (13/21) |
| 48% (62/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (46/51) |
| 48% (25/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 646 | Aces Total | 964 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 710 | Total Double Faults | 680 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 582.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 559.25 |
| 62% (9021/14554) | 1st Serve % | 66% (17802/27082) |
| 68% (6148/9021) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (11785/17802) |
| 47% (2619/5546) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4667/9280) |
| 43% (555/1297) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1079/2562) |
| 38% (5509/14442) | Return Points Win % | 39% (10406/26521) |
| 47% (37/41) | Slam W/L | 22% (5/18) |
| 23% (3/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 67% (36/18) | Cups W/L | 50% (14/14) |
| 45% (45/56) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (16/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (270/206) | Challenger W/L | 46% (191/226) |
| 83% (99/21) | Futures W/L | 72% (457/178) |
| 59% (447/763) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (665/1110) |
| 57% (36/63) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (9/24) |
| 52% (128/246) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (175/332) |
| 50% (123/246) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (194/326) |
| 85% (488/415) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (629/561) |
| 14% (488/68) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (629/68) |
| 21% (354/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (513/120) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
